蜜桃导航

漏 2025 蜜桃导航

1375 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44115
(216) 916-6100 | (877) 399-3307

WKSU is a public media service licensed to and operated by 蜜桃导航.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Contradictions, surprise testimony from prosecution witnesses in Antoine Tolbert case

 Defense attorney Peter Pattakos speaks with his client, Antoine Tolbert during a break in the trial on July 14, 2025.
Matthew Richmond
/
蜜桃导航
Tolbert's attorney Peter Pattakos, was able to expose inconsistencies from prosecution witnesses early in the trial.

Prosecutors in the case against three members of the activist group New Era Cleveland called two witnesses during the second week of trial who may have done more to help the defense.

New Era members Antoine Tolbert, who also goes by Chairman Fahiem, Austreeia Everson and Rameer Askew are facing extortion, kidnapping, aggravated menacing, intimidating a crime victim or witness and other charges in Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas.

A series of 2024 incidents at gas stations at Lee Road and Harvard Avenue and Lee Road and Miles Avenue on Cleveland鈥檚 East Side between Aug. 3 and Aug. 14 led to most of the charges. Another incident, in July, involving an attempted citizen鈥檚 arrest by Tolbert and Askew led to the kidnapping and robbery charges months after Tolbert was first arrested on Aug. 14, 2024.

A co-owner of the Lee-Harvard station testified for the prosecution Monday. Dahoud Hamidah said his employees called him about masked men with guns, who later turned out to be New Era members, outside the station. Hamidah drove to the station after New Era returned early in the morning on Aug. 4.

Hamidah told jurors the employee who called was obviously frightened.

鈥淸The employee] said, 鈥楾here鈥檚 people blocking the front of the store and a lot of people there saying I鈥檓 racist. I don鈥檛 know what to do. I鈥檓 scared,'鈥 Hamidah said.

Hamidah fired the employee accused of racism to 鈥渄efuse the situation.鈥 The other employee working that night quit. Neither could be located to testify in this case, according to Hamidah and police reports.

After arriving at the station, Hamidah spoke with Tolbert and they can be seen on surveillance footage hugging. When officers arrived at the station, they did not arrest any members of New Era.

But Hamidah testified that New Era wasn鈥檛 allowing people to enter or leave the store and the firearms they were carrying were threatening to people.

During cross examination, defense attorney Peter Pattakos pointed out surveillance camera footage showing several customers going in and out of the store while Tolbert and other New Era members were outside.

Following the incidents on Aug. 3 and early in the morning of Aug. 4, members of New Era launched a boycott of the station and began posting on social media and protesting outside.

On Aug. 6, Hamidah, who is not identified in the indictment as a victim, filed a police report. According to that report, which Pattakos read for the jury, Hamidah told police, 鈥淥ne of the male members walked up to [Hamidah] and stated, 鈥楾his is not your (expletive) business. I will do what I want to do and, if you come closer, I will shoot you.鈥欌

Hamidah testified he could not remember telling an officer that. Later, Pattakos played a body camera video from an officer interviewing Hamidah on Aug. 8. In that video, Hamidah accused Tolbert of threatening to shoot him.

鈥淵ou told the police, straight up, that Tolbert said he was going to shoot you with the gun pointed at you and it was on [surveillance] tape, correct?鈥 Pattakos asked.

鈥淵ep,鈥 said Hamidah.

鈥淵ou lied to the officer there, didn鈥檛 you?鈥 Pattakos said.

鈥淭hat came out wrong,鈥 Hamidah said.

Hamidah said the way rifles were slung over Tolbert鈥檚 and Askew鈥檚 shoulders made it seem like, if the guns went off, he could have been shot, even though neither had their hands on the rifles.

Askew was never charged for being present the gas stations.

Pattakos went on to question Hamidah about the surveillance footage from the station on Aug. 3 and from another incident, on Aug. 9, when a gunshot was fired while New Era members were outside boycotting.

In both cases, Hamidah said the surveillance footage that might have captured the threats and the gun shot were missing.

Cuyahoga County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Mary Grace Tokmenko pushed back against the idea that New Era was only at the gas station for a peaceful boycott.

鈥淣ow, the defense talks about Tolbert and Askew, New Era, expressing their opinions on this night," Tokmenko said. "You remember him saying that?"

鈥淵es,鈥 Hamidah said.

鈥淏ut they were expressing their opinion with rifles," Tokmenko said. "Is that right?鈥

鈥淵es,鈥 Hamidah said.

During Tuesday鈥檚 session, prosecutors called a then-13-year-old boy to the stand to testify about a July 27 incident involving Tolbert and Askew.

The boy, whose name 蜜桃导航 is withholding because he is a minor, had been buying marijuana and Tolbert and Askew were at his house to set up a sting of the alleged dealer. After the boy called and asked to buy $20 worth of marijuana, the alleged dealer arrived to find Tolbert and Askew, armed with rifles, walking up to his car and ordering him out.

The alleged dealer ran and police were called. The car was towed and marijuana was confiscated.

Prosecutors focused on the fact that neither the boy nor his mother had asked Tolbert and Askew to come to their house and set up the drug deal. The boy hadn鈥檛 been planning to buy more marijuana before Tolbert told him to call the alleged drug dealer and set up the sale. Prosecutors also focused on the mask worn by Askew, and the guns and vests they both put on, just before confronting the alleged dealer.

On cross-examination, Pattakos asked the boy what charges he thought were brought against Tolbert.

鈥淚 don鈥檛 know," the boy said. "Child endangerment." He then added possibly kidnapping.

The boy鈥檚 mother, who also testified earlier for the prosecution and was in the audience, said quietly, 鈥淭hey should have been charged with child endangerment.鈥

Tolbert and Askew were charged with kidnapping and aggravated robbery for the incident.

鈥淒id you see them abduct anyone?鈥 Pattakos asked the boy.

鈥淣o,鈥 the boy said.

Pattakos went on to question him about the incidents at the gas stations a week later. The boy was with New Era when they went to the gas station on Aug. 3 and on Aug. 9.

He testified that he did not hear any threats made by anyone in New Era toward the gas stations鈥 employees or owners.

On August 9, members of New Era and other protestors taking part in the boycott were outside the station. On this day they were met by several owners, including Hamidah and one of the named victims in the case, Ibrahim Shehadeh.

At one point, the boy asked Pattakos to rewind video footage from Aug. 9. He pointed out a man walking around the side of the station and said, without being asked, that was the person who fired a gun during that protest.

The man in the footage was identified as Shehadeh.

Seconds after Shehadeh walked around the side of the station and out of view of the boy and the camera, a gunshot is heard.

Prosecutors, police officers and Hamidah have pointed to that random gunshot as evidence that New Era was attempting to intimidate the owners of the gas stations.

Matthew Richmond is a reporter/producer focused on criminal justice issues at 蜜桃导航.